~THE GORDIAN KNOT~
Preaching Christ in the World's Most Churched City
Tuesday, December 20, 2011
The Christmas Controversy, Canceling Worship, & Merry Christmas
I'm always nervous about what new controversy will present itself as Christmas rolls around. In Texas, there remains a controversy over the placing of a nativity scene on the courthouse lawn. In South Jersey, a controversy brews over a sign that reads, "Keep Christ in Christmas." Then comes the raging national debate over whether we should say "Happy Holidays" or "Merry Christmas" as we greet one another during this season. As Christians, we have made this our fight, and who dares to stand in our way for the freedom to say "Merry Christmas?"
Thursday, December 15, 2011
THE LYNDEN CHURCH PARADIGM (3): REFORMED CLUBBERS
In the Western corner of Washington State, just a stone’s throw from the Canadian border, is the small town of Lynden. Lynden is a good old American town of hard-working, honest people, predominantly of Dutch decent, who place great value on family and community. But there is something else about Lynden that makes it worth considering. At one time, Lynden held the world’s record for the most churches per capita and per square mile. Within city limits there are dozens of churches. This is a remarkable phenomenon when considering that the population is only around fifteen thousand people. As a pastor in Lynden, I have often thought that Lynden provides a unique study in American suburban Christianity. What happens in a church environment where dozens of churches merely blocks from each church are each searching for identity? What becomes of the message and witness of the church in this environment? And what dangers occur among the churches?
If you were to survey the church landscape in Lynden, certain kinds of religious extremism have occurred. In this post, I want to outline the particular problem of legalism. I have been spent considerable time reflecting on the problems of the mega-church model (see links above), but I also recognize that there is a problem in the opposite direction with Reformed churches who are failing to properly minister the gospel.
Wednesday, October 12, 2011
Of MOHAWKS & MINISTERS: What is a Pastor Anymore?
A while back, I attended a gathering of “pastors” from a variety of different churches in a local community. As I surveyed the crowd of pastors, I was deeply disturbed by the sad way the office of Pastor was represented. I saw everything under the sun: ripped jeans, flip flops, untucked shirts, tattoos, and even a pastor with a mohawk. My colleague reached over and whispered, “what does it even mean to be a pastor anymore?” It was very disturbing. An office that should be held in high esteem by those who are privileged to serve in this capacity is being thrown to the dogs. The whole experience inspired me to do a brief write-up on the warning signs of a pastor who has not been truly called by God to the office.
1. No Formal Theological Training: We have a whole generation of churchgoers not asking or caring as to whether their pastors have been properly trained. Anyone who “feels” called to do ministry, does it. We wouldn’t, of course, just do this in any other occupation. I would be negligent at best if I sent my sick loved one to a self-proclaimed medical doctor who just “felt” called, effectively bypassing medical school and the MCAT. But this hasn’t stopped us today in Christ’s church. As long as the pastor feels lead, has a big heart, and can motivate the people, he is given the title of pastor.
Here are a series of questions you should ask your pastor: 1) From which reputable seminary did you receive your Masters of Divinity Degree? 2) Which faithful church body confirmed your internal calling? 3) When were you ordained to the office and hands laid upon you? 4) Did you learn the Word of God in the original languages? If the pastor took some classes from some Bible college, or other religious university, and skirted the hard work of obtaining a Divinitatis Magistrvm (Masters of Divinity), why would you expect him to labor faithfully every week in the Word to rightly divide the truth to the glory of God and the profit of your soul?
2. No Creed: What your pastor believes is crucial to the well-being of your soul. I Tim. 4:16 commands a pastor to take heed to himself and to the doctrine, for in doing this he will save both himself and those who hear him. So what is your pastor’s doctrine? Since no prophecy of Scripture is of private interpretation, to which historical and collective expression of what Scripture teaches has he promised to honor? This is why Protestants produced creeds and confessions. The Holy Spirit has worked powerfully in Christians who have gone before us. If a pastor has no desire to formally commit himself to some expression of the historic Christian faith, he is making a strong statement that the truth is irrelevant to what he is doing. In that case, run.
3. No Preaching: Is your pastor committed to preach the Word as it is in truth, the Word of God. How central is the Word to what he is doing? Does he confront sin? Is there a proper balance of the law and the gospel in his preaching? Or, are you getting sermon series like the following: Living on Empty? Going Off-Roading With God, Church Is a Verb, Like is a Marathon, etc. If the Word is being used like a giant fortune cookie from which the pastor pulls a few verses to support his topic, that is exactly the kind of ear-tickling the apostle warned against (see 2 Tim. 4:1-5). The assumption is being made today that the most Spirit-filled churches are led by pastors who can best determine for the people what they need. In this way the pastor thinks he is being relevant to a post-modern culture, when in reality he is only pandering to the wants of assumed seekers. If your pastor is refusing to preach through the Word of God, he is a false shepherd. God gave us books and stories for a reason.
4. No Holiness: Pastors are called to set an example of godliness in all aspects of their lives. How does your pastor look and act? Does his life demonstrate that he is concerned about your soul? Does he strive to push you heavenward as a pilgrim here on earth? Or is he virtually indistinguishable from the world? I am wearied of seeing forty to fifty year old pastors’ dress and act like teenagers. This strange, what I call incarnational hipsterism, has overrun the church with worldliness. Age denial is one thing, but it’s quite another to live out that denial in an artificial and insincere manner as a pretext of doing ministry in a relevant way. Our love as pastors should be without hypocrisy, that is, without masks.
5. No Ecclesiology: How important are the three marks of a faithful church to your pastor: 1) the pure preaching of the gospel, 2) the right administration of the sacraments, 3) and church discipline? The greatest evidence of whether your pastor is called by God will be witnessed in his convictions about the doctrine of the church. Does he care enough to discipline wayward members? Is he more concerned about what the church looks like than its holiness and catholicity? Is he more concerned about being relational rather than theological, subjective rather than objective? Does he avoid all polemics and defense of the truth? Does the fruit of his work show that he has been successful is creating a niche event for a particular age group? What do the demographics of his ministry really demonstrate? And finally, does he care more about making the worship service a program, a show, rather than feeding the sheep with the Word, and nurturing them in their struggles against sin?
Being assured that your pastor is called by God is crucial to the well-being of your soul. Hopefully, some of the above questions will help you determine if indeed you are sitting under a faithful minister of the Lord Jesus Christ.
Friday, August 19, 2011
Wolfgangus Musculus (1497-1563) on The Difference Between Old & New Covenant
Just found a rare English copy (1578) of Musculus's Loci Communes and here are some interesting comments on the Old & New Covenant:
Of the word testament, I have spoken before. It agrees indeed with the new covenant, because of the death of Christ, the Testator. But it does not agree well with the old covenant, and that of the law.
Secondly, when we speak of the old testament or covenant, we must not look to the covenant of Abraham, but to the giving of Moses's law. The same apostle calls the old bargain or the old constitution, to which belongs those things which he disputes of in the same chapter of the Old Testament. And it is called Old, not because it is the first and most ancient, which the covenant of Abraham doth not bear withall, but in respect of the new. For in respect of that of Abraham, both the old and new are called new, because they succeeded after them. And these two dispensations of that perpetual and eternal covenant, have this relation between them, that the one began to be called Old in respect of this new; and the other was to be called New in respect of the old and abolished one. For whatsoever is abolished, is there utterly ended and brought to nothing, so that nothing of it remains any more; or else it is changed into another thing, as if it were renewed. And nothing is renewed except by the succession of that which is new. And yet the same is not called New considered in itself, but in respect to that which was before. If the covenant of Moses had been utterly made nothing, it could not have admitted the succession of any new. Wherefore, that Apostle says to the Hebrews: In that he says a new testament, he has worn out the old. For that which is worn out and waxes ancient and old, is ready to vanish away, it must not be be understood that the the points of the substance of Moses covenant are utterly brought to nothing, God forbid. But rather that the accessory points of it are abrogated by the success in of a new dispensation. And that abrogation of which we spoke before, the Apostle calls and abolishment and decay.
Of the word testament, I have spoken before. It agrees indeed with the new covenant, because of the death of Christ, the Testator. But it does not agree well with the old covenant, and that of the law.
Secondly, when we speak of the old testament or covenant, we must not look to the covenant of Abraham, but to the giving of Moses's law. The same apostle calls the old bargain or the old constitution, to which belongs those things which he disputes of in the same chapter of the Old Testament. And it is called Old, not because it is the first and most ancient, which the covenant of Abraham doth not bear withall, but in respect of the new. For in respect of that of Abraham, both the old and new are called new, because they succeeded after them. And these two dispensations of that perpetual and eternal covenant, have this relation between them, that the one began to be called Old in respect of this new; and the other was to be called New in respect of the old and abolished one. For whatsoever is abolished, is there utterly ended and brought to nothing, so that nothing of it remains any more; or else it is changed into another thing, as if it were renewed. And nothing is renewed except by the succession of that which is new. And yet the same is not called New considered in itself, but in respect to that which was before. If the covenant of Moses had been utterly made nothing, it could not have admitted the succession of any new. Wherefore, that Apostle says to the Hebrews: In that he says a new testament, he has worn out the old. For that which is worn out and waxes ancient and old, is ready to vanish away, it must not be be understood that the the points of the substance of Moses covenant are utterly brought to nothing, God forbid. But rather that the accessory points of it are abrogated by the success in of a new dispensation. And that abrogation of which we spoke before, the Apostle calls and abolishment and decay.
Tuesday, June 14, 2011
ABOUNDING GRACE RADIO: Waging the Warfare for Truth
Here is the next Abounding Grace Radio Series on the nature of Christian ministry--important series for office bearers.
Monday:2 Timothy 2 Waging the Warfare for Truth
Tuesday: 2 Timothy 2 Waging the Warfare for Truth
Wednesday: 2 Timothy 2 Waging the Warfare for Truth
Thursday: 2 Timothy 2 Waging the Warfare for Truth
Monday:2 Timothy 2 Waging the Warfare for Truth
Tuesday: 2 Timothy 2 Waging the Warfare for Truth
Wednesday: 2 Timothy 2 Waging the Warfare for Truth
Thursday: 2 Timothy 2 Waging the Warfare for Truth
Sunday, May 22, 2011
PREDICTING HAROLD CAMPING's NEW PREDICTION
MY PREDICTION: I am going to be so bold and make a prediction about what Harold Camping will say in response. Camping Prediction: "My views have not changed, May 21, 2011 began the 153 day period of judgment ending with the rapture on October 21, 2011--the BIBLE guarantees it!"
I am making this prediction before any public response from Camping, note the date and time, it's Sunday May 22--9:00 AM.
I am making this prediction before any public response from Camping, note the date and time, it's Sunday May 22--9:00 AM.
Saturday, May 14, 2011
HAROLD CAMPING PREDICTION May 21 2011 Judgment Day Audio
Here is an audio from Abounding Grace Radio to air on KARI 55 May 20, 2011 in the lower BC mainland and Western Washington.
HAROLD CAMPING PREDICTION
See also my articles:
Part One the History of Camping
Part Two the Critique of Camping
HAROLD CAMPING PREDICTION
See also my articles:
Part One the History of Camping
Part Two the Critique of Camping
Wednesday, May 11, 2011
ABOUNDING GRACE RADIO--EZEKIEL'S VISION of the GLORY
Here is this week's Abounding Grace series on EZEKIEL ONE!
Ezekiel 1 Chariots of Fire
Ezekiel 1 Chariots of Fire
Ezekiel 1 Chariots of Fire
Ezekiel 1 Chariots of Fire
Scanned from the 1578 Geneva Bible.
Ezekiel 1 Chariots of Fire
Ezekiel 1 Chariots of Fire
Ezekiel 1 Chariots of Fire
Ezekiel 1 Chariots of Fire
Scanned from the 1578 Geneva Bible.
Saturday, May 7, 2011
Friday, May 6, 2011
MISSION & MANDATE--What About the Great Commission? (Updated)
What is the church's mission and mandate? Is a church determined to be faithful by what it is doing "out there" as opposed to what happens on the Lord's Day? Just what is the Great Commission? And what did Jesus mean when he commissioned his church to preach and baptize? Is that commission for everyone? I ask this because the minute concerns are raised today about worship practices contrary to the Word of God, responses follow of people trying to discredit the ordinary means that God commisioned his church to honor until Christ returns. So the suggestion today is that a faithful church is marked by how many ministries or social programs it offers to the broader society. Is this correct?
Let's play a little game of church golf. This is from D.G Hart,
How would you rate the work of your church? A ministry scorecard might include the following categories: if your church has a children's ministry give it 2 points; a welcome team ministry, 1 point; a tapeministry, 1 point (but if a tape and book ministry, 2 points). A couples' ministry should be worth 2 points as should an international student ministry, a mothers' ministry, and a newlywed ministry; but subtract a point if it is a newlywed mothers' ministry. Women's ministry should also receive 2 points and-in the spirit of equity-a men's ministry should receive the same, but if your men's group is an adjunct of Promise Keepers don't give any points-you have to start it on your own. AIDS ministries, homeless ministries, and low-income housing ministries all receive 3 points, a score befitting a big church with many resources and talented members. Throw in 1 point each for a weekly Bible study, foreign missions, and the Sacraments (2 points for the latter if your church allows the laity to set up the Lord's Supper). Finally, add 1 point for a Sunday morning service, 2 points if you have both a contemporary and a traditional service.
Now tally up your score. How did your church do? Be careful, though. Before you delight in a double-digit number you should know that this game is like golf-the higher the score, the worse the performance. The reason, of course, for this inverse method of scoring comes from our Lord himself. When he sent his disciples out into the world he prescribed the means that they would use to disciple the nations. In the Great Commission Christ tells the apostles to teach and baptize. In other words, he defined the ministry of the church as encompassing two tasks only-Word and Sacrament.
Such a narrow view of the ministry means that par for the church is 4: 1 point for preaching, 2 points for the Sacraments, and 1 for prayer. Any activity beyond these results in a bogey church.
Hart makes an excellent point with this example. The mandate that Christ gave to his church in the Great Commission is to preach and to baptize. Historically, the Great Commission has been understood to be fulfilled by ordained servants in Christ's church. Not everyone is ordained to preach and baptize. Today, however, all distinctions have been broken down so that there is no difference between what the ordained pastor does and what the layman does. For instance, I saw a church marque the other day, and under the minister section it read, "everyone".
What happens in this scenario? The mandate and mission of the church becomes marginalized as it is assumed that "real" ministry happens "out there". Social programs take a higher seat than what Christ commissioned his church to do in Matthew 28. It's no wonder church services are dying in attendance and the second service dropped. People have been taught to devalue what happens when we "come together" as Christ's body. There is no confidence that anything powerful is happening when the gospel is preached. We have been programmed to lose confidence in the foolishness of the message preached to save those who believe.
In fact, I would argue that the more people are taught to value the specific ministry of Word and Sacrament, the other social agendas that the church is obsessed with today, will be actively pursued by those who have already been transformed by this specific means of grace that Christ has chosen to make himself known. As the saints are given the food and drink of eternal life, they are then equipped to "go out" as pilgrims to be salt and light in the world--a very different thing than what Jesus specifically commissioned his ordained servants to do in Matthew 28. The more this occurs, the greater our light becomes in the world.
So let us learn to distinguish what needs to be distinguished and realize that a church is being faithful to its mandate when due attention and place is given to the preaching of the gospel and administration of the sacraments. Return confidence to these "foolish" means, and watch our witness spring forth to the ends of the earth in a real life-changing way.
So let us learn to distinguish what needs to be distinguished and realize that a church is being faithful to its mandate when due attention and place is given to the preaching of the gospel and administration of the sacraments. Return confidence to these "foolish" means, and watch our witness spring forth to the ends of the earth in a real life-changing way.
CJG
Tuesday, May 3, 2011
LEGALISM--WHAT IT IS & WHAT IT IS NOT (UPDATED)
What is legalism? The charge of legalism is so carelessly flung around today that people have no idea what the term means. It’s become a catch phrase to write off any church that is doctrinal—a word also much of an embarrassment to people today. There are three ways this term is being misapplied and abused to attack churches that have remained confessionally Protestant.
Monday, May 2, 2011
ABOUNDING GRACE RADIO: The FORGOTTEN HOLINESS OF GOD
ABOUNDING GRACE RADIO airs Monday-Friday on KARI at 8:30 AM & 2:45 PM
Monday, May 2: Isaiah 6 Forgotten Holiness
Tuesday May 3: Isaiah 6 Forgotten Holiness
Wednesday May 4: Isaiah 6 Forgotten Holiness
Thursday, May 5: Isaiah 6 Forgotten Holiness
A Great Class at the REFORMED BIBLE COLLEGE
This was a fun class, thanks for a very enjoyable time in our study through John! Visit the Reformed Bible College. http://www.rbcollege.com/
Saturday, April 30, 2011
The LYNDEN CHURCH PARADIGM: I LOVE MY "BANK"?
I think it's safe to say we now know where the marketing strategy "I Love My Church" came from. Notice the last question of the commercial, "Do you love your bank? Be sure to read my Part One on the Marketing Strategy, and Part Two on the Big Business Model.
Friday, April 29, 2011
The LYNDEN CHURCH PARADIGM: A Signs & Wonders Movement (2)
Some will not agree with what I write here, but I ask the reader to take the time to thoughtfully reflect on what is presented. What I write is out of sincere concern for my brothers and sisters in this community. I want nothing more than for us all to walk in the truth.
A Marketed God
Do you have a problem? Are you divorced and need acceptance? Are you tired of playing church? Has legalism beat you down? Do you want real life giving worship? Do you need a mentor, a life coach? Recovery step program? Addiction release? Need a prayer partner? What about a connection for your teenager? You name it we have a program for you. If any of this sounds familiar it is because thousands of churches in this land have learned how best to build their churches based upon the wants of the people. The church is offered as a product and the people as consumers. But for this to work, you have to give the consumer what he wants, and to do that properly, nothing can look or feel churchy since those things run up against a God who is a lot more difficult to market.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)











